Screener
FAB vs ACSV
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.17% less per year.
- FAB is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAB follows a index tracking strategy; ACSV uses active selection.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAB | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $12M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.08% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAB and ACSV
Explore further