Screener
FARX vs CTA
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.20% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than FARX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FARX is classified as mixed asset, while CTA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FARX follows a active selection strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| FARX | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.96% | 19.97% |
| Max drawdown | -5.83% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FARX and CTA
Explore further