Screener
FARX vs IMF
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.30% less per year.
- IMF is significantly larger than FARX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FARX is classified as mixed asset, while IMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FARX follows a active selection strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| FARX | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $301M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.96% | 10.47% |
| Max drawdown | -5.83% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FARX and IMF
Explore further