Screener
FARX vs ISMF
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.15% less per year.
- ISMF is significantly larger than FARX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FARX is classified as mixed asset, while ISMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FARX follows a active selection strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| FARX | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $57M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.96% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -5.83% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FARX and ISMF
Explore further