Screener
FBCG vs KONG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- FBCG costs 0.32% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCG is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FBCG follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCG | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $22M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.5% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -19.98% |
Similar to FBCG and KONG
Explore further