Screener
FBND vs FCLO
Fidelity Total Bond ETF vs Fidelity CLO ETF
Key differences
- FCLO costs 0.36% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than FCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBND follows a index tracking strategy; FCLO uses multi strategy.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBND | FCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $25M |
| Since | 2014 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.25% | -0.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBND and FCLO
Explore further