Screener
FCEF vs XNAV
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 2.42% less per year.
- FCEF is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCEF | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 3.69% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $31M |
| Since | 2016 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.84% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -44.81% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCEF and XNAV
Explore further