Screener
FCOM vs XLCI
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF vs State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- FCOM costs 0.27% less per year.
- FCOM is significantly larger than XLCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCOM is classified as equity, while XLCI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FCOM follows a index tracking strategy; XLCI uses option income.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCOM | XLCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $2M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.32% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.95% | -7.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCOM and XLCI
Explore further