Screener
FDAT vs MANI
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
FDAT is a fixed income ETF, while MANI is an alternative ETF. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and MANI 0.01%.
- FDAT is a fixed income fund, while MANI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; MANI uses active selection.
- FDAT covers North America; MANI covers emerging markets.
- MANI costs 0.77% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $20M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -0.73% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.