Screener
FDAT vs MEMA
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
FDAT is a fixed income ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and MEMA 0.85%.
- FDAT is a fixed income fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; MEMA uses long short.
- FDAT covers North America; MEMA covers emerging markets.
- FDAT costs 0.07% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $13M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -13.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.