Screener
FDAT vs MOOD
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
Key differences
- MOOD costs 0.05% less per year.
- MOOD is significantly larger than FDAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDAT is classified as alternative, while MOOD is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; MOOD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MOOD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | MOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.73% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $116M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.68% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 14.16% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -14.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDAT and MOOD
Explore further