Screener
FDEM vs XFLX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- FDEM costs 0.72% less per year.
- FDEM is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDEM is classified as equity, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FDEM follows a index tracking strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDEM | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $508M | $49M |
| Since | 2019 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -33.65% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDEM and XFLX
Explore further