Screener
FDEM vs XNAV
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- FDEM costs 1.02% less per year.
- FDEM is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDEM is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDEM follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDEM | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $508M | $31M |
| Since | 2019 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -33.65% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDEM and XNAV
Explore further