Screener
XFLX vs FFEM
FundX Flexible ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.37% less per year.
- XFLX is classified as fixed income, while FFEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX follows a active selection strategy; FFEM uses index tracking.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $39M |
| Since | 2002 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 9.73% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +63.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.53% | 21.43% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XFLX and FFEM
Explore further