Screener
FDG vs TMFM
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.40% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TMFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $117M |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | -19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.0% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -31.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and TMFM
Explore further