Screener
TMFM vs ACSG
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.36% less per year.
- TMFM is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $15M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and ACSG
Explore further