Screener
FDG vs TMFS
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.40% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $64M |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and TMFS
Explore further