Screener
FDG vs XDSQ
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF – Quarterly
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than XDSQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG is classified as equity, while XDSQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; XDSQ uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | XDSQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $71M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.0% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -26.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and XDSQ
Explore further