Screener
FDG vs XUSP
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than XUSP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG is classified as equity, while XUSP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; XUSP uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | XUSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $44M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +37.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.0% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 15.98% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -22.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and XUSP
Explore further