Screener
FDIQ vs RPG
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than FDIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDIQ is classified as fixed income, while RPG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDIQ | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2011 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.13% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -52.86% | -36.58% |
Similar to FDIQ and RPG
Explore further