Screener
FDLO vs XMLV
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- FDLO costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FDLO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDLO | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $750M |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.4% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.91% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDLO and XMLV
Explore further