Screener
FDRS vs FFLS
Corgi ETF Trust I vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 1.11% less per year.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; FFLS uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $42M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.87% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -11.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and FFLS
Explore further