Screener
FDRV vs MOTO
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- FDRV costs 0.29% less per year.
- FDRV follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRV | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $10M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.94% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -63.89% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRV and MOTO
Explore further