Screener
MOTO vs CARZ
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF
Key differences
- CARZ is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; CARZ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CARZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CARZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | CARZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $51M |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +114.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +35.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +18.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 26.03% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -51.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and CARZ
Explore further