Screener
FFEM vs EMBX
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
FFEM is an equity ETF, while EMBX is a fixed income ETF. FFEM charges 0.60% a year and EMBX 0.76%.
- FFEM is an equity fund, while EMBX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- EMBX is much larger than FFEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFEM | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $242M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 5.33% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.3% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.24% | 6.07% |
| Max drawdown | -16.29% | -37.55% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.