Screener
FFLS vs BFIX
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Build Bond Innovation ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while BFIX is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and BFIX 0.45%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while BFIX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; BFIX uses option income.
- BFIX costs 1.15% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than BFIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | BFIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $12M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -8.03% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.