Screener
FFLS vs CGBL
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CGBL is a mixed asset ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CGBL 0.33%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CGBL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
- CGBL costs 1.27% less per year.
- CGBL is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 9.86% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -11.66% |
Similar to FFLS and CGBL
Explore further