Screener
FFLS vs CSHP
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CSHP is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CSHP 0.20%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CSHP is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CSHP uses active selection.
- FFLS covers North America; CSHP covers global markets.
- CSHP costs 1.40% less per year.
- CSHP is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $190M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 0.34% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -0.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.