Screener
FFLS vs MEAR
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while MEAR is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and MEAR 0.26%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while MEAR is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- MEAR costs 1.34% less per year.
- MEAR is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 2.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -2.68% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.