Screener
FFLS vs ICSH
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while ICSH is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and ICSH 0.08%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while ICSH is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- ICSH costs 1.52% less per year.
- ICSH is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.38% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -3.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.