Screener
FFLS vs EMPB
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
Key differences
- FFLS costs 0.61% less per year.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; EMPB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | EMPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 2.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $18M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | 11.41% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -7.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and EMPB
Explore further