Screener
FFLS vs SHV
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while SHV is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SHV 0.15%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while SHV is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; SHV uses index tracking.
- SHV costs 1.45% less per year.
- SHV is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $20.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 4.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -0.45% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.