Screener
FFND vs EEMA
One Global ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both FFND and EEMA are equity ETFs. FFND charges 1.00% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: FFND follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- EEMA costs 0.51% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than FFND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -44.18% |
Similar to FFND and EEMA
Explore further