Screener
FFND vs AAXJ
One Global ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both FFND and AAXJ are equity ETFs. FFND charges 1.00% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: FFND follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- AAXJ costs 0.28% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than FFND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -44.52% |
Similar to FFND and AAXJ
Explore further