Screener
FFND vs IPAC
One Global ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both FFND and IPAC are equity ETFs. FFND charges 1.00% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: FFND follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- IPAC costs 0.91% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than FFND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -31.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.