Screener
FFND vs THNQ
One Global ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- THNQ costs 0.32% less per year.
- THNQ is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; THNQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $322M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +38.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 25.96% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and THNQ
Explore further