Screener
FFTY vs CGGG
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGG costs 0.41% less per year.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | CGGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $78M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | — |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -17.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and CGGG
Explore further