Screener
FFTY vs NJAN
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
Key differences
- NJAN is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFTY is classified as equity, while NJAN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; NJAN uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, FFTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | NJAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $371M |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 7.13% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -20.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and NJAN
Explore further