Screener
NJAN vs NMAR
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- NJAN is significantly larger than NMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NJAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NJAN | NMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $371M | $93M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.12% | 6.30% |
| Max drawdown | -20.70% | -9.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NJAN and NMAR
Explore further