Screener
FICS vs AFLG
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and AFLG are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and AFLG 0.55%. The main difference: FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- FICS covers global markets excluding the US; AFLG covers North America.
- AFLG costs 0.15% less per year.
- AFLG is much larger than FICS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $648M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.7% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.29% | 11.68% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -35.84% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.