Screener
FICS vs AFMC
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and AFMC are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and AFMC 0.68%. The main difference: FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- FICS covers global markets excluding the US; AFMC covers North America.
- Over the last three years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $162M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.7% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.29% | 15.06% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -42.14% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.