Screener
FICS vs AFSM
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and AFSM are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and AFSM 0.75%. The main difference: FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- FICS covers global markets excluding the US; AFSM covers North America.
- FICS costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last three years, AFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $98M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.7% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.29% | 18.13% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -43.54% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.