Screener
FISR vs JNK
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- JNK costs 0.10% less per year.
- JNK is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, JNK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- JNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | JNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 3.86% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -22.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and JNK
Explore further