Screener
FISR vs SJNK
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- SJNK costs 0.10% less per year.
- SJNK is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SJNK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SJNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2019 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 7.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 3.23% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -19.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and SJNK
Explore further