Screener
FLAU vs FLCH
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs Franklin FTSE China ETF
Key differences
- FLAU costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLCH is significantly larger than FLAU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLAU covers asia pacific markets; FLCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAU | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $282M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 2.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | -4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.64% | 19.12% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -62.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAU and FLCH
Explore further