Screener
FLAU vs FLAX
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAU costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAU | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $47M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.64% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAU and FLAX
Explore further