Screener
FLAX vs AAXJ
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.53% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and AAXJ
Explore further