Screener
FLAX vs IPAC
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and IPAC
Explore further