Screener
FLAX vs EPP
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.28% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLAX covers asia pacific markets; EPP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and EPP
Explore further