Screener
FLGV vs KMAR
Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- FLGV costs 0.70% less per year.
- FLGV is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLGV is classified as fixed income, while KMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FLGV follows a index tracking strategy; KMAR uses structured outcome.
- FLGV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLGV | KMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $998M | $35M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 9.38% |
| Max drawdown | -17.63% | -10.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLGV and KMAR
Explore further